Monday, March 13, 2017

Response to Harvey, part 1

David Harvey has done me a great honor by reviewing my book, Marx’s Inferno: The Political Theory of Capital, for Jacobin. To have the first review of my first book penned by the most famous living teacher of Capital is a boon. Professor Harvey’s wide-ranging response highlights a number of disagreements of broad significance, not only for academic Marxologists, but for the political Left. He claims that my book will be “a first salvo in what promises to be a grand battle to redefine Marx’s legacy, both intellectual and political.” I certainly hope that he is right. At present, the Left is weak but energized. Young people are widely disenchanted with capitalism and the post-Cold War global order, and are open-minded about socialism. At the same time, the political and economic organizations of the Left are in shambles, and there is no theoretical or tactical center of gravity. I think this is precisely the moment to reread the history of Left theory, to return to and to rework first principles.

No one is more important, in this respect, than Marx. The question is, which Marx? My book defends the dignity of the first volume of Capital, and argues that it contains the Marx we need to recover today. Harvey disagrees, arguing that “taking Volume 1 as a standalone treatise is deeply problematic.” This disagreement, which he calls his “most serious objection” to my book, reflects three deeper but less apparent divisions. One concerns the sort of theory Marx provides. The second concerns the actual content of Marx’s arguments in Volume One. The third concerns what is needed now, in our present. Each of these deep disagreements should be brought into the open, for wide-ranging debate on these matters is of the utmost importance.

1.       Part 1: What sort of book is Capital?

The research question that my book poses and tries to answer is the old question of Marx’s “method of presentation” in Capital. Why does Volume One take the form it does? Because Marx himself addresses this question – howsoever elliptically – in the course of rebutting the claim that he is applying a Hegelian method to the study of political economy, the scholarship on this question is dominated by efforts to find a Hegelian or quasi-Hegelian method of presentation in Volume One. This has had mixed results. Everyone acknowledges that parts of the text look rather Hegelian. On the other hand, major chunks of the book don’t look Hegelian at all: much of Parts Three, Four, and Eight, together adding up to about 40% of the book. These are the “historical” parts. Hegelian Marxists tend to be embarrassed by these parts, since they don’t add to much to the development of the concepts. Social historians, like Gareth Stedman Jones, think they are the only valuable part of Capital. The two halves are never knit together, though.

My idiosyncratic answer to this problem is that Marx’s structured Volume One on the model of Dante’s Inferno. This is not so weird as it might sound. Metaphorical descents into Hell were widespread in the socialist literature of the nineteenth century. Marx’s bête noir, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, did the most with the trope. Moreover, the moral categories that structure Dante’s Hell – incontinence, force, fraud, and treachery – were pervasive in the moral economy of early socialism, for the simple reason that the Christian-Aristotelian heritage permeated popular morality. Marx, I argue, wrote Capital as a descent into the social Hell of modern capitalism. He wanted to acquaint his readers with the inner workings of the capitalist mode of production, while displacing the categories of socialist moral judgment onto “the ensemble of social relations.” As my book shows, reading Volume One in this way allows us to make sense of its arguments in a connected and holistic way, and as a carefully constructed intervention into the socialist movement of Marx’s day, without excising half the book as “digressions” or “illustrations” or “beside the point.”

David Harvey objects, however, that this “builds a singular and exclusive account that pushes other readings to one side,” and that it rests “on the shallow but convenient grounds” that only Volume One was seen through to publication by Marx. According to Harvey, “if we only read Volume 1 of Capital, … we will also misunderstand the point of Volume 1.” We will do so because “the assumption throughout Volume 1 is that all commodities exchange at their value.” This allows Marx to construct “a model of capitalist activity that reflects ‘the hell’ of the laborer,” but it does not allow him to consider the “alienation”  of “the ‘affluent worker’ who is protected by a trade union, lives in a suburban house, has a car in the driveway, a TV in the living room, and a laptop in the kitchen, and vacations in Spain or the Caribbean.” Nor does it allow him to explain how “capital accumulation … rests on [the] ‘rational consumption’” of the working class, which must be enabled by the capitalist class. Harvey claims that these issues can come to the fore and receive their proper explanation only once Marx’s drops the assumption that prices equal values, which he does in Volumes Two and Three. Hence, Volume One, on its own, gives us a partial, and hence false, picture of capitalism. My book, by arguing that Volume One can stand on its own, does Marx and my readers a disservice.

The basic presupposition of Harvey’s interpretation is that, when Marx wrote and published Volume One, he was “presenting his findings,” and that, in the service of presenting them in a “persuasive” and “palatable” way to a readership of “self-educated artisans and laborers,” he “simplified” those findings, “even to the point of falsification.” If this is true, then only his unpublished works – the Grundrisse, Volumes Two and Three, the various preparatory drafts – can give us a true picture of Marx’s “findings.” In short, Harvey’s Marx is an explainer. He has a grand, unified theory, but knows that it is too difficult to communicate to “self-educated artisans and laborers,” so he simplifies it, and dresses it up with “literary and cultural references,” so as “to make sure his audience would get what he was talking about.”  

My Marx, by contrast, is an arguer. He doesn’t have a fully-worked out theory in his back pocket. Instead, he is oriented by a set of disagreements with the classical political economists, and with his fellow socialists, and is working out, in Capital, as full-fledged a response to those disagreements as he can. The literary form of his intervention is not a costume he dresses his theory up in; it is the form of the theory itself. His audience knows very well what he is talking about, because he is not descending upon them from the mountaintop, but responding to on-going arguments and controversies within the socialist and workers’ movements. The metaphorics of Marx’s text – the vampires and werewolves, Lazarus and Moses and the prophets, machine-gods and automata – are commonplaces. They show up again and again in socialist tracts from both sides of the Channel. What is unique to Marx is the use to which these commonplaces are put, and the elaborate interconnections among them.

I think my picture of Marx, and of Capital, is more accurate that Harvey’s. After all, it is strange to say that you miss the point of Volume One if you read it on its own. Marx did, after all, publish Volume One, on its own. In fact, he did so three times – twice in German and once in French! He was preparing to publish it again – on its own – when he died. And he approved a Russian translation of Volume One – on its own – in 1872. Whatever aspiration he had for Volumes Two and Three, he clearly thought that Volume One could be read and understood “as a standalone treatise.” That I try to read the book this way does not mean that everyone should just ignore Marx’s unpublished writings. My reading does not exclude those efforts, or push them to the side, simply because it does not engage in that sort of work. There are many excellent scholars who have shed much light on Marx’s unpublished writings. There is next to nothing on Volume One of Capital as a published work. I think, frankly, that we are more comfortable with Marx if we picture him as a scholar unable to communicate the complexity of his truth in a mere 900 pages, instead of as an engaged political thinker, working out his ideas in the scrum of debate.

26 comments:

wdclarke said...

I really like your distinction between Marx as an "explainer" vs marx as an "arguer", and have only skimmed Harvey's piece in Jacobin, as I have not yet read your book, but my hunch is that you are right and he is wrong: having read Robert Paul Wolf and Marshall Berman on Marx's self-conception as a political economist & literary proto-modernist, it makes no sense that his use of tropes was merely the deliberate dumbing-down of his ideas for the lay reader. They are, rather, constitutive of the warp and woof of his thought

Marx Inhell said...

Thank you! Wolff was incredibly important to me as a formative influence. Also, S.S. Prawer and Terrell Carver, who try to integrate the form and content of Marx's arguments, each in their own way.

wdclarke said...

Ellen Meiksins Wood me! But I just a literary type, so looking forward to reading this! Will have to re-visit Dante first...I notice from your bibliography that Braudel/Wallerstein/Harvey don't figure much, which makes sense given your final paragraph in the next post.

Marx Inhell said...

Wallerstein and Braudel don't figure much because they are not claiming to interpret Marx, but to tell us how it really went down. I don't have a firm position on how it really went down, though I have my sympathies. My firm position is on what Marx's argument is in Part VIII (and his argument there might be right or wrong).

wdclarke said...

Thanks! In my own diss I was interested less in how it went down at the transition than for what theories of the transition meant to our understanding of the nature/logic of capital (and how those were represented in fiction), and never really got a clear sense that Harvey was distinguishing capitalism from commerce, arbitrage...There was an issue of Historical Materialism where he and Ellen MW replied to each other, but he didn't seem to make it any clearer from where I was standing back in '09. Anyhow, really keen to get into this :)

SONA SHINGH said...

Lucknow Escort Provide http://parinight.in/ Independent Lucknow Escort,Lucknow Escorts Service Lucknow Escort Service Lucknow Independent Escorts,Lucknow Female Escorts Lucknow Escort Independent Lucknow escort girl introducing high class escort service http://parinight.in/ contact us for fun with Lucknow escort girls.

http://parinight.in/
Lucknow Escort Service
Lucknow Escort
Escort Service In Lucknow

http://angelnight.in/
Lucknow Escort Service
Lucknow Escort
Escort Service In Lucknow

http://janice.in/
Udaipur Escort
Escort Service Udaipur

http://anamta.in/
Agra Escort Service
Agra Escort

http://jaipurescort.org.in/
Jaipur Escort Service
Jaipur Escort

http://citygirljaipur.com/
Jaipur Escort Service
Jaipur Escort

http://needlover.in/
Jaipur Escort Service
Jaipur Escort

http://escortjalandhar.in/
Jalandhar Escort Service
Jalandhar Escort

Bangalore Escorts said...

https://lucknowescortsservic.blogspot.in/2016/05/lucknow-escorts-servicetop-models-call.html?showComment=1522817482247#c657700216181979284

Bangalore Escorts said...

This post is very unique and informative.

Bangalore Escorts
Independent Bangalore Escorts
Bangalore Independent Escorts
Bangalore Escorts Service
Bangalore Escorts Agency
Escorts in Bangalore
Call girl in Bangalore
Sexy Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts said...

Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Service

Independent Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Agency

Escorts in Bangalore

Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts said...

This post is very sexy and dynamic so it is a complete nice post.

Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Service

Independent Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Agency

Escorts in Bangalore

Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts said...

This Article is very enerjatic and knowledgefull.


Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Service

Independent Bangalore Escorts

Bangalore Escorts Agency

Escorts in Bangalore

Bangalore Escorts

geetarani said...

Escorts Near radisson blu hotel delhi I
Call Girls in Mehrauli I
Escorts Near jaypee vasant continental hotel delhi I
Escorts in Greater kailash I
Escorts Near sheraton hotel delhi I
Call Girls in Munirka I
Escorts Near hilton garden inn delhi

pakescorts646 said...

Finally, we are aware of some fraudulent acts committed by most Escorts in Lahore. That is the main reason why you should settle with our agency; Famous Escorts in Lahore for your call girls in Lahore. Our call girls are strictly scrutinized and they have reputable track record void of criminal cases. Good enough, our agency takes full responsibility of your security and privacy. Contact us today and book for your desired Lahore Escorts.

Chitra Mathur said...


Hi,
Thank you for sharing blog. I read your all blog and I am waiting your new blog.

Chennai Escorts Chennai Escorts Chennai Escorts

Mumbai Escorts said...

I really love the way in which you explain the things.

Soniya Ayer said...

What a lovely content for the reader. Thanks for posting and i'm gonna read this book.
Also love to share with my Chennai escorts friends.

Beautiful Escorts Girl said...

Bangalore Escort
Escorts in Bangalore
Best Escorts Bangalore
Escorts Service Bangalore
Bangalore Escorts Service
Hot Escort Girls in Bangalore
High Class Escorts Bangalore
Escort Girls Bangalore
Bangalore Escorts
Independent Bangalore Escorts

aaina sahu said...

Jaipur Escorts
Independent Jaipur Escorts
Escorts in Jaipur
Jaipur Escorts Service
Jaipur Call Girls
independent escorts in Jaipur
Jaipur escorts agency
Jaipur escort services
High Profile escorts Girls in Jaipur
high profile escort service in Jaipur
Adult Service Providers in Jaipur
celebrity escorts services Jaipur
top class escort Jaipur
Jaipur escort

Jaipur Escorts said...

Jaipur Escorts
Independent Jaipur Escorts
Jaipur Escorts Services
Escorts in Jaipur
Independent Escorts in Jaipur
Call Girls in Jaipur

Beautiful Escorts Girl said...

Bangalore Escorts

chitramathur said...

Hi
I read your Blog. you Blog is knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing blog.
https://sharenator.com/profile/chitramathur948/
http://www.rtgstudios.in/handshake/Hds/user/chitramathur948
http://www.sexygirlspoint.com/agency/chitra-mathur/
https://dzone.com/users/3107664/chitramathur94.html
http://www.ethiogrio.com/members/profile/chitramathur948
https://www.tinystep.in/user/Chitra-Mathur
https://www.mypinkfriday.com/users/zCc8a1fd
https://www.advertigo.net/advertisement-id-5168684-ad.htm
https://play.eslgaming.com/player/12449818/

chitramathur said...

Hi
I read your Blog. you Blog is knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing blog.
https://sharenator.com/profile/chitramathur948/
http://www.rtgstudios.in/handshake/Hds/user/chitramathur948
http://www.sexygirlspoint.com/agency/chitra-mathur/
https://dzone.com/users/3107664/chitramathur94.html
http://www.ethiogrio.com/members/profile/chitramathur948
https://www.tinystep.in/user/Chitra-Mathur
https://www.mypinkfriday.com/users/zCc8a1fd
https://www.advertigo.net/advertisement-id-5168684-ad.htm
https://play.eslgaming.com/player/12449818/

needloversjaipur said...


Jaipur is now famous in all over the world because there are a many multinational companies available where numerous individuals working to Jaipur Escorts servive their life. In these companies there are number of young and beautiful Jaipur Escorts girls who are working for some amount. Some of them do not like to waste their life in doing some typical jobs. Youth escorts in Jaipur want some additional features and functions within their companies. If they do not get those facilities and features in their companies they are leaving jobs and searching better Jaipur Escortsoptions for their convinience. Some of them are bold minded Call Girls Jaipur girls and therfore they need some fun with money. Such girls joins Escorts Service In Jaipur for fulfilling their requirements.

Jaipur Escorts
Escort Service in Jaipur

Jaipur Call Girls
Jaipur Escorts
Jaipur Escorts Service

Lucknow Escorts
Lucknow Escort

Escorts In Lucknow
Lucknow Escorts Service

mumbai zoya said...

Finer Fantasy - Hi, I am Zoya 23 year old girl, who offer the VIP Mumbai Escorts service, I am Available 24X7. I'm also providing the all kind of service.
Very hot girls, Enjoy much much more Beautiful girls Just Click Our Site You Can Call Me Also My No Is +919891948309….!!!

Mumbai Escort
Mumbai Escorts
Mumbai Independent Escorts
Mumbai Female Escorts
Mumbai Russian Escorts
Mumbai VIP Escorts
Mumbai Hotel Escorts
Mumbai Air Hostess Escorts
Andheri Escorts
Powai Escorts

Bangalore Online said...

Wow! Thank you! I always needed to write on my website something like that. Really thank you! Really Great.
To know more me and my servic please visit my our website
Bangalore Escorts
Bangalore Escorts Service

riya datta said...

http://riyadatta.com/
Hyderabad Call Girls Service
Independent Call Girls Hyderabad
Escorts Service in Hyderabad
Call Girls in Hyderabad
Hyderabad Escorts
Hyderabad Escort Service
Escorts in Hyderabad
Hyderabad Call Girls
Female Escort in Hyderabad
Independent Escorts in Hyderabad
Hyderabad Independent Escorts
Russian Escorts Hyderabad
Hyderabad Escorts Girls
Hyderabad Female Escorts
Hyderabad Escorts Service
Escorts Service Hyderabad
Escort Service in Hyderabad
Independent Hyderabad Escorts
Independent Escorts Hyderabad
Hyderabad Escorts Agency
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad
Housewife Escorts Hyderabad
Russian Call Girls in Hyderabad
http://menakshi2t.blogspot.com/
http://riyadatta12.blogspot.com/
http://riyadattag.blogspot.com/
http://menakshi2t.blogspot.com/